NCR · REFERENCE
GGN·DLF-5₹14,400/sqftNOIDA·SEC137₹6,800/sqftNOIDA·SEC150₹9,200/sqftDELHI·DWARKA₹12,500/sqftDELHI·VASANT₹18,000/sqftDELHI·ROHINI₹9,800/sqftFARIDABAD₹4,800/sqftGHAZIABAD₹5,400/sqftREPO RATE6.50%RBI · May'26DELHI·CIRCLE₹67,200/sqmFY25-26GGN·CIRCLE₹55,000/sqmFY25-26CRE·YIELD7.2–8.8%NCR avgWW·REPORTS50K+ simsper reportGGN·DLF-5₹14,400/sqftNOIDA·SEC137₹6,800/sqftNOIDA·SEC150₹9,200/sqftDELHI·DWARKA₹12,500/sqftDELHI·VASANT₹18,000/sqftDELHI·ROHINI₹9,800/sqftFARIDABAD₹4,800/sqftGHAZIABAD₹5,400/sqftREPO RATE6.50%RBI · May'26DELHI·CIRCLE₹67,200/sqmFY25-26GGN·CIRCLE₹55,000/sqmFY25-26CRE·YIELD7.2–8.8%NCR avgWW·REPORTS50K+ simsper report
Compare

Feasibility consultant vs software in India

Use software first to screen a plot quickly and cheaply — it tells you the bylaw-correct FSI and a range of profit/IRR outcomes in minutes. Hire a consultant when the plot clears that screen and the decision now needs on-site judgement, negotiation, or a signed professional opinion. Most serious deals in India end up using both: software to screen and narrow, a consultant to close.

 SoftwareConsultant
Best for a first screen on a new plotYes — fast, cheap, run on many plots before committingUsually reserved for plots that already passed a first screen — a consultant's time is the expensive resource
On-site inspection (access, encroachment, condition)Not providedThis is a consultant's core job
Negotiation with seller, broker, or authorityNot providedThis is a consultant's core job
Signed professional opinion for a bank or investorNot provided — a report is not a signed opinionA registered consultant can provide this
Number of scenarios modeled50,000 Monte Carlo scenarios (White Warp specifically)A handful of manually built scenarios, typically
Cost per plot checkedLow — practical to run on several candidate plotsHigher — usually reserved for plots already worth a consultant's time
CoverageDepends on the tool — White Warp covers Delhi NCR and Chennai todayA local consultant can work anywhere they practice

A practical workflow: use both, in order

  1. Screen first with software. Run every candidate plot through a feasibility tool to get the bylaw-correct FSI and a profit/IRR range before spending money on any one of them.
  2. Shortlist the plots that clear the bar. Drop the ones that fail on FSI, setback, or a clearly negative profit range.
  3. Bring in a consultant for the shortlist. On-site inspection, negotiation, local relationships, and a signed opinion where one is needed — none of which software provides.
  4. Close with the consultant's judgement, not the software's number alone. The report gives professionals their time back; it does not replace professional judgement.

FAQ

Should I use software or hire a consultant for a plot in India?

Use software to screen the plot first — it gives a bylaw-correct FSI and a range of profit/IRR outcomes quickly and cheaply. Bring in a consultant once the plot clears that screen and the decision needs on-site judgement, negotiation, or a signed opinion.

Can software replace a feasibility consultant entirely?

No. Software does not inspect the site, negotiate, or sign a professional opinion. It gives professionals their time back on the bylaw lookup and scenario math, and does not replace professional judgement.

Do consultants use software too?

Increasingly, yes — using a screening tool to narrow candidate plots before spending billable hours on the ones worth a full manual study is a common workflow, not a replacement for the consultant's role.

Why does a feasibility report need to cite its sources?

Per-figure sourcing isn't optional best practice — it's required under IVS 104/106, RICS valuation standards, and India's Registered Valuers Rules, r.8(3)(g). Any credible consultant or software output should be able to show where each figure came from.

See also: Best feasibility tools for India · White Warp vs manual feasibility